http://www.hsshf.org/share/PLCAA/S397.pdf

it’s a bit dry, but noting in summary by interesting point, rather than section, that:

1.) child safety locks are not required in handgun transfer except from liscensed dealer.
2.) such device not required in transfer of a C&R handgun.
3.) a person who has lawful posession and uses such device is entitled to immunity.
3.1.) (if a guy steals my unlocked gun, shoots somebody with it, i could be sued)
4.) the AG shall conduct a study to determine whether uniform standard for testing of projectiles against body armour is feasible.
4.1.) considered: variations in performance related to length of barrel of handgun or rifle from which projectile is fired.
4.2.) the amount of powder used to propel…

so…

1.) nothing new here
2.) some relief
3.) some relief
3.1.) lock em up, for your protection
4.) it’s a study, with recommendations to be considered, possibly adopted by administrative law.
4.1.) seems to indicate that projectiles only to be considered in earlier language, but this muddies the waters. seems to allow a projectile to be identified as multi-use. probably would result in steel core and such being identified as armour peircing if acheiving certain velocity…
4.2.) more mud, written by somemone who knows nothing about amunition.

this is not so bad. things could be a lot worse. buy AP projectiles now, if that’s your thing, and load them before the bill is passed. don’t sell them to anybody. the law applies to person, as well as manufacturer.

would be nice if section 6 was stripped, but prolly gonna pass intact.