<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM reportedly in talks to buy Chrysler</title>
	<link>http://www.pointmanspage.com/2007/02/18/gm-reportedly-in-talks-to-buy-chrysler/</link>
	<description>Strange in a Stranger Land</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.pointmanspage.com/2007/02/18/gm-reportedly-in-talks-to-buy-chrysler/#comment-954</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pointmanspage.com/2007/02/18/gm-reportedly-in-talks-to-buy-chrysler/#comment-954</guid>
					<description>These are rumors . . . GM has &quot;been in talks&quot; with Ford - Honda and Toyota . .

Who knows at this point . . all I know is that GM would be a world of hurt for acouple reasons
A- The intial cost of obsorbing the union work force
B- Obsorbing the cost of the future production models coming off the line very soon
C- They would have to pick up in the middle of DCX's &quot;project x&quot; (their transformation/reformation project)
D- GM just came out of their own reformation project . . and are just now starting to be able to look to the future . . .

I dont possbily see how GM could swing this . . .
Oh also - alot of benz's are being produced on Chrysler frames (and benz is looking to bring out a whole new &quot;a class&quot; (small car class) based off a Chrysler designed base) - So not to mention - benz has some vested interest riding on chrysler's wellfare (Also as a side note . . .part of the reason chrysler lost money over the year was the fact the benz has to tap into chryslers north american revenue - but they still didnt do as bad as some others . . . )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are rumors . . . GM has &#8220;been in talks&#8221; with Ford - Honda and Toyota . .</p>
<p>Who knows at this point . . all I know is that GM would be a world of hurt for acouple reasons<br />
A- The intial cost of obsorbing the union work force<br />
B- Obsorbing the cost of the future production models coming off the line very soon<br />
C- They would have to pick up in the middle of DCX&#8217;s &#8220;project x&#8221; (their transformation/reformation project)<br />
D- GM just came out of their own reformation project . . and are just now starting to be able to look to the future . . .</p>
<p>I dont possbily see how GM could swing this . . .<br />
Oh also - alot of benz&#8217;s are being produced on Chrysler frames (and benz is looking to bring out a whole new &#8220;a class&#8221; (small car class) based off a Chrysler designed base) - So not to mention - benz has some vested interest riding on chrysler&#8217;s wellfare (Also as a side note . . .part of the reason chrysler lost money over the year was the fact the benz has to tap into chryslers north american revenue - but they still didnt do as bad as some others . . . )
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.pointmanspage.com/2007/02/18/gm-reportedly-in-talks-to-buy-chrysler/#comment-953</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pointmanspage.com/2007/02/18/gm-reportedly-in-talks-to-buy-chrysler/#comment-953</guid>
					<description>why not Honda ? seems they are pretty reliable , the Accord has a very good reputation or so I hear. Hey ! you already own one why not make it two ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not Honda ? seems they are pretty reliable , the Accord has a very good reputation or so I hear. Hey ! you already own one why not make it two ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
